Search for: "United States v. Richard" Results 81 - 100 of 4,354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:44 am by Beatrice Yahia
The United States has condemned Iran over the attacks in Kurdistan and Syria, calling them as “reckless and imprecise. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
United States The trial to determine the damages owed to writer, E Jean Carroll by Donald Trump is set to begin on Tuesday 16 January 2024 in New York. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 7:32 am
The closest the country has come to the prosecution of a former president over official actions came in 1974, when Richard M. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
United States The Harvard Cyberlaw Clinic has filed an amicus brief in the case of Hermès International v Rothschild in the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit representing individual creatives and arts and cultural organisations. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 3:30 pm by Matt Miller, Registered Patent Attorney
United States law determines this by considering: (1) whether the accused infringer actually had access to the original work; and (2) whether the accused infringing work is “substantially similar” to the original work. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Nelson, Harvard Law School Businesses in the United States are increasingly supporting regulation and regulators against judicial decisions curtailing agency authority. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
   From In Custodia Legis: "A history of blasphemy laws in the United States"; "Clara Barton and the Geneva Convention. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 9:06 pm by Bryn Hines
Pierce explained that in 1983, the Supreme Court’s MVMA v. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:13 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Chief Justice, Supreme Court of the United States from Senator Richard Blumenthal: [snipped] “The Supreme Court is currently weighing whether to decide a critical question in United States v. [read post]