Search for: "United States v. Richardson" Results 101 - 120 of 592
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Elle Rothermich
After joining the Supreme Court, Justice Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 1:20 pm by Linda McClain
” Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg made this declaration in her majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 3:55 pm by CAFE
Supreme Court, opinion & dissent, 5/29/07 United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:53 pm by Drew M. Capuder
While still a practicing lawyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1973 argued to 9 men on the United States Supreme Court in a historically significant case, Frontiero v. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 7:25 am by Jason Rantanen
” From the Introduction:  On August 11, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down its opinion in one of the most closely-watched, and potentially consequential, antitrust decisions in recent years, Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:45 am by NCC Staff
On July 24, 1974, a unanimous Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am by Phil Dixon
In conclusion, the unanimous court observed: Wayne Jones was killed just over one year before the Ferguson, Missouri shooting of Michael Brown would once again draw national scrutiny to police shootings of black people in the United States. [read post]
28 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
In the post-war South, white southern Democrats used felony disenfranchisement to deny those rights, invoking historical similarities between the legal statuses of slaves and convicts as justification.Today, according to a report by the Sentencing Project, nearly 40% of the 6.1 million people disenfranchised by a felony conviction are black.Despite the troubled association of felony disenfranchisement laws with racial discrimination, courts, like the 2002 Florida court, generally have upheld them in… [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm by Patricia Hughes
There are the usual exemptions, as well as others not usually specified, including people just passing through the province to elsewhere, although they must stop only for necessary reasons (also see a similar provision for people transiting through the NWT to Nunavut for less than 12 hours and for non Yukon residents travelling to a neighbouring jurisdiction, allowed a maximum 24 hours), “a family unit of parents and children, to facilitate shared custody of children as per a court… [read post]
14 May 2020, 11:25 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
The outcome:Lanard Toys Limited (“Lanard”) appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida granting summary judgment in favor ofDolgencorp LLC, Ja-Ru, Inc., and Toys “R” Us–Delaware,Inc. [read post]