Search for: "United States v. Rubin"
Results 61 - 80
of 261
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2019, 4:07 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
Exigent Circumstances: What They Are and How They Allow Police to Search and Seize Without a Warrant
15 Mar 2019, 11:46 am
App. 1991), citing to United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 1:50 pm
" Rubin v. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 2:23 pm
The complaint in Martin v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Learning What Works in Regulation March 7, 2018 | Cary Coglianese, University of Pennsylvania Law School, and Todd Rubin, Administrative Conference of the United States Government officials increasingly recognize the value in experimentation and evaluation when it comes to a variety of government programs. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 4:04 am
Indiana, in which the court will decide whether the Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause applies to the states, and Culbertson v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
The justices also issued one opinion yesterday: In United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 4:20 am
United States, which asks whether the Supreme Court should overrule the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows a defendant to be prosecuted for the same crime in both federal and state court. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 10:06 am
Juni v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 4:07 am
United States, which asks whether the Supreme Court should overrule an exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows a defendant to be prosecuted for the same crime in both federal and state court. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 3:50 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger observes that United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am
United States by an equally divided court, with Justice Anthony Kennedy recused, for this blog. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 10:38 am
Thanks to my colleague John Rubin for helping me think through the issues in State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 12:00 pm
Earlier this year, in State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 4:11 am
The first was Hughes v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
The justices also held unanimously in United States v. [read post]
