Search for: "United States v. San Francisco" Results 101 - 120 of 1,644
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2012, 10:15 am by Rick Hasen
Jessica Levinson has posted this draft on SSRN (University of San Francisco Law Review). [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 11:08 pm
Several Indian tribes sued claiming that the plan will spiritually contaminate the San Francisco Peaks that they believe to be sacred. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 1:22 pm by Michael McCann
1 HARVARD JOURNAL OF SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT LAW 40 (2010)On May 24, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its eagerly anticipated decision in American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:24 pm
06/12/09 San Francisco Chronicle:(06-12) 21:01 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- Attorney General Jerry Brown, who tried to persuade the state Supreme Court to overturn California's ban on same-sex marriage, took the same position in federal court Friday [Perry et al v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 7:55 am by Amy Howe
Monday’s decision in City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 3:44 pm by Paul Weiland
  Then in 2004, the Commission listed coho salmon south of Punta Gorda (which is located in Humboldt County) as an evolutionarily significant unit, which includes the south of San Francisco Bay population. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:00 pm
I am just getting back from a week in San Francisco, California teaching the PLI Patent Bar Review Course at PLI's California Headquarters in downtown San Francisco. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:42 pm by Unknown
District Court for the Northern District of California--which includes San Francisco and Silicon Valley. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:44 am by Cormac Early
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8), and United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm by Florian Mueller
The location is still San Francisco, of course.This has already been confirmed by counsel for the parties as well as the United States Department Of Justice. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:17 am by James Bickford
  Barnes describes the Court as having “been in scold mode,” “reject[ing] the work of the San Francisco-based court without a single affirmative vote from a justice” in five consecutive cases. [read post]