Search for: "United States v. Saunders"
Results 61 - 80
of 118
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In that case, Saunders v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am
In Education Week’s School Law Blog, Mark Walsh covers yesterday’s order inviting the United States to weigh in on Ridley School District v. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
On Monday 30 June 2014, Mr Justice Saunders heard mitigation on behalf the four defendants who had pleaded guilty. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
United States, 393 F.3d 1277 (Fed. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 3:20 pm
There again, the peculiarly interesting state of trade mark law in the United Kingdom and, not far beyond it, in the territory of the European Economic Area, might be closer to the cause. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
Weinstein in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 6:30 pm
The recent case of Schron v. [read post]
30 Jun 2012, 3:37 pm
RUBY SAUNDERS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Walter Saunders, Appellant, v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:05 am
See United States v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 4:33 pm
Spotify only became available in the United States in 2011, although the Swedish company has operated in Europe since 2006. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Surveillance for Acute Viral Hepatitis—- United States, 2007. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 7:17 am
The style of the case is Sanders v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
The verb “abridge” is used as a synonym for discrimination in exactly this way in the Fifteenth Amendment which says “The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:31 am
See Saunders v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:18 am
The dissent cited to United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 5:21 am
State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:37 am
TweetIn Saunders v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 12:39 am
In the courts: RG v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and North Wiltshire District Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 198 (AAC) (05 May 2011): Failure to provide family with enough housing benefit to give disabled daughters separate bedrooms not breach of human rights Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors v The Legal Services Commission [2011] EWHC 1323 (Admin) (25 May 2011): Immigration solicitor fails in challenge to Legal Aid contract – “sad” but could have… [read post]
31 May 2011, 6:10 am
United States, in which the Court interpreted the scope of the federal witness tampering statute can be applied, while James Bickford summarized the Court’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
