Search for: "United States v. Schmidt"
Results 21 - 40
of 234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2022, 12:23 pm
A group of legal and political experts Monday testified before the US House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol that former President Donald Trump’s allegations of voter fraud during the 2020 presidential election are unsubstantiated. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:07 am
Aleksandr V. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm
From Hiers v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Nicklin J found that, because Ms Murray’s tweet was stated as fact, it had one meaning; the defence of truth failed. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 7:42 am
May God save the United States of America, the state of Florida, and this honorable court. [read post]
4 May 2021, 3:30 am
Schmidt For almost half a century, Roe v. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 11:04 am
Table of Contents Key Findings Introduction Evaluating the Federal R&D ax Credit Effectiveness of the R&D Tax Credit — Does the R&D Credit Increase R&D Spending? [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 1:35 pm
The report outlines how the United States may be falling behind on certain artificial intelligence research, particularly compared to China. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 11:17 am
Burnham, a Professor of History at The Ohio State, wrote a scathing letter to the Lancet’s editors, as well as opinion pieces in History News Network.[7] David Rothman, a professor at Columbia University, similarly took Proctor to task for his pretensions of doing “history” while testifying for the lawsuit industry.[8] Perhaps the most telling rebuttal came from Professor Alan Blum, a physician and anti-tobacco activist. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm
Schmidt (Tenn. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 1:01 am
Schmidt’s Donald Trump v. the United States report that Mueller was prevented from exploring that avenue by then Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.] [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:59 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am
But two new sources of information—the fifth volume of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee’s bipartisan report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt’s new book “Donald Trump v. the United States”—raise even more questions about the investigation. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 2:01 am
He is most recently the author of "Donald Trump v. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 11:16 am
Rebel Oil Co., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
At the same time, the state's responsibility of deference appears to be deficient. [read post]
