Search for: "United States v. Schmidt" Results 161 - 180 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm by Florian Mueller
In U.S. federal court, it's not impossible but certainly rather difficult to satisfy the eBay v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
United States, on the President’s removal power, which was “severely undercut[]” by a unanimous Court less than a decade later in Humphrey’s Executor (p. 416). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 10:32 am by Susan Brenner
Three merely note that the United States “adopted the SHA-1 has algorithm . . . as a Federal Information SMWgo2 Processing Standard. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am by tekEditor
BALLON - #141819 [email] HEATHER MEEKER - #172148 [email] GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP [email] [address] [phone] [fax] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE INC. ________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ORACLE AMERICA, INC., Plaintiff, v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm by Dan Ernst
Civil WarKalyani Ramnath, Harvard University (kalyaniramnath@fas.harvard.edu)Boats in a Storm: Law and Displacement in Postwar South AsiaEvan Taparata, University of Pennsylvania (taparata@sas.upenn.edu)State of Refuge: Refugee Law and the Modern United StatesAdnan Zulfiqar, Rutgers Law School (adnan.zulfiqar@rutgers.edu)Collective Duties in Islamic Law: The Moral Community, State Authority, and Ethical Speculation in the late 9th to the 14th… [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 12:00 am by Jan von Hein
Today the Basel standards, in fact, strongly influence national banking regulation both in the European Union and in the United States. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:06 am
Thomas, of the US Consumer Product Safety Commission presented an overview of existing regulatory framework for nanoscale materials used in consumer products in the United States. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Tom Schmidt, in his marvelous contribution explaining how the Judges’ Bill of 1925 changed the implicit nature of Supreme Court decisions and authority, illustrates the point well. [read post]