Search for: "United States v. Segal" Results 61 - 80 of 134
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
” Also in an op-ed for The Hill, Ashley Baker urges the court to “be particularly cognizant of the potential for judicial overreach” in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 4:07 am by Eric Segall
I wanted to do well in what I was pretty sure was a losing cause.I began my argument as follows talking as loudly as I thought reasonable: "Good morning your Honor, my name is Eric Segall  and I represent the United States Department of Education in this litigation. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by Marissa Miller
” In an op-ed for the Denver Post, Tom Bie addresses the potential implications of PPL Montana for “anyone who likes fishing, rafting or canoeing public water in the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court held on Monday that a decision not to grant a proportional sentence reduction does not require a detailed written explanation. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:45 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court held that an individual who surrenders his guns to police and is then convicted of a felony has the right to transfer those guns to an independent third party, including by selling them. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 9:33 am by Dave Maass
John Conyers Jr., (D-MI), ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee David Segal, executive director of Demand Progress Maggie Gyllenhaal, actor and activist Oliver Stone, director of The Untold History of the United States and Nixon John Cusack, actor and activist Wil Wheaton, actor and writer Molly Crabapple, artist and writer Jesselyn Radack, U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Tara Hofbauer
Circuit Court’s en banc opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 5:13 am by Amy Howe
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger takes a lighter look at Missud v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 5:42 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a “once-in-a-decade insider trading case” that, he argues, presents “a valuable opportunity to clear the underbrush that has accumulated” in American insider trading law. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 6:13 am by David Markus
In earlier decisions, courts have upheld the law.But that was before United States v. [read post]