Search for: "United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc"
Results 161 - 180
of 327
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Apotex Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
Topek, LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:33 pm
Honeywell Int’l Inc., No. 2012-1660 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 2:16 pm
In Gertz v. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Also deceptive mailings: “Prize Notification Bureau” with “State of California Commisioners of Registration” seal—FTC v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:28 pm
In an eight-page complaint, GoldieBlox, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
There is a long history of this association in the Commonwealth and the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:06 am
Streck, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
Inc.,[8] which had different facts to the case in point, and also emphasized the decision in Evans v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 7:00 am
NPE Cases at the ITC In John Mezzalingua Associates Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
Department of Justice NEW YORK—In a Manhattan courtroom, Apple and the Department of Justice gave their opening statements in the e-book price-fixing case United States of America v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
The Supreme Court noted that, under the doctrine of patent exhaustion, 'the initial authorised sale of a patented item terminates all patent rights to that item' (Quanta Computer Inc. v LG Electronics Inc.): the rationale behind this rule is that, once a patentee has received his reward through the sale of the patented item, he has no further right to restrain the use or enjoyment of it (United States v Univis Lens Co.). [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:32 am
Clarifying the holding in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
This is an application of the “narrow standard” of contributory liability articulated in Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
Bell Sports, Inc. [read post]
