Search for: "United States v. Shade"
Results 41 - 60
of 243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
And how should the United States and the world respond? [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 1:55 am
The lawsuit in Ocean Grove Camp Meeting Association of the United Methodist Church v. [read post]
29 Apr 2021, 3:56 am
The Umerji ruling undermines the CPS guidance and casts a different shade on rule 9.3 as it applies to the sending process. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:34 am
And in this useful summary of the recent oral argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:15 am
By Joshua Scott Chilton, Legal Assistant & Receptionist, Woodruff Family Law Group On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States of America made a ruling in a case known as Obergefell v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:55 pm
United States in 2001); and even one’s own front porch (Florida v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 4:26 am
Citations to the second most-cited state, the United Kingdom, made up only 3% of the total. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
Personal sentiments about this egregious order should not shade a candid assessment of precedent and constitutional law. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 3:31 am
The opposer contended that the mark SOCK IT UP was used in the United States not by Applicant Fan, but by JY Instyle, and therefore JY Instyle owned the mark, not Fan. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 1:04 pm
Supreme Court in Schuette v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971) (refusing to stop the publication of classified documents about U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War); Florida Star v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 1:24 pm
United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971) (refusing to stop the publication of classified documents about U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War); Florida Star v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:29 pm
" In 1802, "prints" were added (2 Stat. 171); in 1831 "musical compositions" were added (4 Stat. 436); in 1856 "dramatic compositions" were added (11 Stat. 138); and in 1856 "photographs" were added (13 Stat. 540).The primary issue addressed by the United States Supreme Court in 1884 was whether "Congress had the constitutional right to protect photographs and negatives thereof by copyright. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 1:44 pm
" The "United States" then files suit to evict Trump and his family from the White House.It seems to me that's a leadership dispute, and that that's true even if President Trump hadn't formally challenged his suspension in court or filed any other sort of petition -- exactly like Martin here. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:16 am
United States, the latest opportunity to revisit the Third-Party Doctrine that served as a facile diversion when created, and has undermined any potential for digital privacy in the future. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:23 am
Private Jason Smith The case of R (on the application of Smith) (FC) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for Defence (Appellant) and another is being heard today in the Supreme Court. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
Combe Incorporated v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 3:11 pm
A happy outcome in the United States was the decision here in Christian Louboutin S.A. v Yves Saint Laurent America Inc., No. 11-3303 (2d Cir. 2012) 1 ‘…the Red Sole Mark has acquired limited secondary meaning as a distinctive symbol that identifies the Louboutin brand, and…it is therefore a valid and protectable mark…’ (page 25) here.A second problem featured in the recent decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union… [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 11:18 am
United Artists Television, Inc. and Teleprompter Corp. v. [read post]
