Search for: "United States v. Shaver" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm by Eugene Volokh
From a supplement to a self-represented appellant's brief in Shaver v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am by Ron Coleman
Applicant maintained that the dominant portion of his design is the map of Africa, while in the cited mark the map of the United States is dominant, that the cited design suggests that Africa dominates the United States, and that the alteration of his design to fit the United States outline within the map of Africa profoundly changes the commercial impression of his mark as compared to the cited mark. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Shavers and Bitcoin Savings and TrustCase number: 13-cv-00416 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas)Case filed: July 23, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 18, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-106 SEC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
” Judge Mazzant wrote: “Shavers argues that the BTCST investments are not securities because Bitcoin is not money, and is not part of anything regulated by the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:46 am by Arina Shulga
It can be used to purchase goods or services, and as Shavers stated, used to pay for individual living expenses. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:00 am by LTA-Editor
By Shira Zucker This August, Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas ruled in SEC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Shavers argued that the BTCST investments are not securities because Bitcoin is not money, and is “not part of anything regulated by the United States. [read post]