Search for: "United States v. Shaver"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2023, 1:04 pm
From a supplement to a self-represented appellant's brief in Shaver v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
Shavers and Bitcoin Savings and Trust, Civil Action No. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
The first fact pattern was that of the Kidane v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:19 am
Applicant maintained that the dominant portion of his design is the map of Africa, while in the cited mark the map of the United States is dominant, that the cited design suggests that Africa dominates the United States, and that the alteration of his design to fit the United States outline within the map of Africa profoundly changes the commercial impression of his mark as compared to the cited mark. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 7:42 am
Shaver v. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 10:04 pm
State of Cal., 811 F. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 11:52 am
Lea Shaver's article in 69 Wash & Lee L. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 10:55 am
Light Co. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:56 am
Comm’n v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:00 am
Shavers and Bitcoin Savings and TrustCase number: 13-cv-00416 (United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas)Case filed: July 23, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: September 18, 2014 10/23/2014 01/21/2015 2014-106 SEC v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
” Judge Mazzant wrote: “Shavers argues that the BTCST investments are not securities because Bitcoin is not money, and is not part of anything regulated by the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 12:46 am
It can be used to purchase goods or services, and as Shavers stated, used to pay for individual living expenses. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:54 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
By Shira Zucker This August, Judge Amos Mazzant of the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas ruled in SEC v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Shavers argued that the BTCST investments are not securities because Bitcoin is not money, and is “not part of anything regulated by the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 5:50 am
SEC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 4:34 am
Constitutional rights In its 1978 opinion in Shavers v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:26 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
