Search for: "United States v. Silberman"
Results 41 - 60
of 113
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2018, 11:38 am
United States, a case I discuss below about a 1998 U.S. missile strike on a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
United States and Florida v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 11:40 am
Barrett then held two high-profile conservative clerkships, first with Judge Laurence Silberman of the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm
Jackson Lecture on the Supreme Court of the United States, on Wednesday, July 25, 2018, at 4:00 p.m. in Chautauqua’s Hall of Philosophy. [read post]
27 May 2018, 8:27 pm
Based on the Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
TianRui v. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 12:07 pm
TianRui v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:51 am
Silberman’s title. [read post]
17 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm
He was both an Assistant US Attorney and then United States Attorney, followed by 17 years of service as a US District Judge for the Eastern District of California. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 9:01 am
He has also cited and relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:33 am
NLRB, May 20, 2016, Silberman, L.). [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
If the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm
Head is a split opinion that is reminiscent of United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm
Head is a split opinion that is reminiscent of United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:01 pm
”Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg expressed genuine appreciation for the draft dissent Scalia delivered to her privately, before circulating it to the conference, in the 1996 case of United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
NLRB Regional Directors retain authority to hold elections, certify results even absent Board quorum
22 Sep 2015, 8:48 am
Dissenting, Judge Silberman found the merits “not particularly important” but found the case itself “of great significance” because he believed the majority ignored binding precedent in Laurel Baye (UC Health v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 5:49 pm
In Rivera v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:17 pm
Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454 U. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 9:57 am
As widely reported and commented upon, in Verizon v. [read post]
