Search for: "United States v. Sorrell"
Results 41 - 60
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2012, 9:38 am
Here is the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 8:07 am
United States, but this time Justice Kennedy joined the four liberal justices to hold that criminal defendants who enter into plea agreements can benefit from retroactive changes to the sentencing guidelines.In CSX Transportation v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 6:44 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am
In United States v Davis, 726 F3d 357 [2nd Cir 2013], defendant was federally charged with assaulting another inmate at the Metropolitan Detention Center, which the government alleged was “within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” an element of that offense. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:31 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 9:41 am
Alliance for Open Soc'y Int'l (2013); Sorrell v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:29 am
Writing for the Opinionator blog of the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse contrasts the Court’s historical reluctance to deregulate corporate speech with the current Court’s willingness to do so in Citizens United and Sorrell v. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 1:41 pm
1-800-411-Pain Referral Service, LLC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:09 am
UNITED STATES Tuesday, April 26, 2011 10-779 SORRELL, ATT’Y GEN. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:17 am
” Sorrell v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
Today, small-business owners celebrate the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Janus v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 12:45 pm
The Sorrell Court found that case inapposite, partly because the information in United Reporting was in the government’s possession while private pharmacies held the records in Sorrell (even though they held them subject to a very specific regulatory regime about prescription drugs). [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 1:12 pm
United States Affirm Details Fox, v. [read post]
23 Apr 2011, 10:16 pm
United States (10-5258). [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm
In 1996, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in Daniel J. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:01 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:02 pm
Sorrell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 3:51 pm
" "None of [the] decisions [in the NYT v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
” Sorrell [v. [read post]
