Search for: "United States v. State Investment Co." Results 121 - 140 of 1,525
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2014, 12:46 am by Arina Shulga
 The SEC complaint can be found here.Shavers main argument was that the BTCST investments were not securities because Bitcoin is not money, and is not part of anything regulated by the United States. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 11:57 am by Fei-Lu Qian
In wake of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 2:54 pm
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently dismissed for a second time a federal securities class action against American Express Co. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:45 am by Guest Blogger
The two phrases—“officers of the United States” and “office under the United States”—are seen as co-extensive. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:36 am by Amber Walsh
Based in Greenwich, Conn., the firm invests exclusively in healthcare companies in the United States, Canada and Western Europe. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 8:30 am by Tucker Chambers
Today, Stone Brewing is one of the largest breweries in the United States and its beer is sold on five continents…. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Andrew Lahser, Patent Attorney
MayeronHoneywell’s Patents in PDF FormatUnited States Patent No. 7,634,504 US7634504.pdf United States Patent No. 7,142,948 United States Patent No. 6,975,958 United States Patent No. 7,584,899 United States Patent No. 7,159,789 United States Patent No. 7,159,790 United States Patent No. 7,476,988 Interesting Quotes from Honeywell’s ComplaintParagraph 3: > Upon… [read post]