Search for: "United States v. State of Mont." Results 161 - 180 of 408
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 8:11 am by Sean Wajert
United Parcel Serv., Inc., 639 F.3d 942 , 947 (9th Cir. 2011)); see also Negrete v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]
20 May 2014, 3:06 pm by David Miller
Recently, the United States District Court for the District of Montana ordered (pdf) the U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 11:30 am by Jon Sands
United States-Montes-Ruiz, No. 12-50398 (Rawlinson with Gould and Lemelle (EDLA)) ---  In Setser v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
[a] regulatory body ... of ... the United States"—in this case, the FDA. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm by Peter Vickery
As I mentioned on Monte Belmonte's show on the River, although federal law governs the taking itself, state law determines the meaning of "just compensation. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 8:04 pm by Peter Vickery
As I mentioned on Monte Belmonte's show on the River, although federal law governs the taking itself, state law determines the meaning of "just compensation." [read post]