Search for: "United States v. Steven Pile" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
Steinbach, once a litigation partner Williams & Connolly LLP and latterly a teacher of United States History and American Government courses at the Sidwell Friends School in Washington, DC, on how United States history can also be taught and understood by focusing on constitutional history (YouTube). [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
The most straightforward way to understand his thinking is apparently that the pendency of the inevitable lawsuits would so roil the financial markets that the economy would be damaged in the meantime—AND that doing so would be worse than the alternatives.Again, he is right that there would be a political crisis, and the days, weeks, or months that the world would spend waiting for a resolution would make the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 9:14 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
There have been smart, enterprising, and strong women in the United States since its founding, but a woman has been on the Supreme Court only since September 25, 1981. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm by Mark Walsh
Roberts opens the session with the traditional script: “I have the honor to announce, on behalf of the court, that the October 2017 term of the Supreme Court of the United States is now closed, and the October 2018 term is now convened. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
Coverage of Whitford comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR and Michael Wines in The New York Times, who reports that a “decisive ruling striking down the Wisconsin Assembly map could invalidate redistricting maps in up to 20 other states,” and from Steven Mazie at The Economist’s Espresso blog. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 6:16 am
Goldstein, 6 NY3d 119 [Court of Appeals of New York [2005]. . .; accord Matter of State of New York v. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm by Schachtman
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
 . to comply with state law while also being in compliance with federal law”); Strayhorn v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 9:43 am by Ilya Somin
In the lawsuit titled United States of America v. 434 Main Street, Tewksbury, Massachusetts, the government is suing an inanimate object, the motel Caswell’s father built in 1955. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:49 am
The US Supreme Court finally issued it's long-awaited decision in decision in Bilski v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:13 pm
 But also because I was jarred by the juxtaposition of his dissent in Johnson with his decision to join the 8-1 majority in yesterday's ruling in United States v. [read post]