Search for: "United States v. Strang"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2008, 5:05 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 May 2017, 8:30 am
The order’s focus faces outward towards the alien residents of the subject countries, not inward towards persons in the United States like the plaintiffs . . . . [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am
Fifteen briefs have been filed in support of South Dakota, including by the United States government. [read post]
18 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
On April 16, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its decision in U.S. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:17 am
” In U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 9:16 am
As the docket overview now indicates, the Supreme Court of the United States has decided to ask for the views of the Solicitor General of the United States on Samsung's petition for writ of certiorari relating to the second California Apple v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 11:17 pm
They have some thoughts on Jones v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
The Court heard argument on Monday in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 3:08 pm
" The First sticks by this, case, United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:28 am
This week, the state supreme court heard oral arguments on the retroactivity of Miller v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:35 am
Royal Dutch Shell, manages to raise an even broader question: Are there any substantive limits to the federal government’s power to regulate matters occurring outside and having nothing do with the United States? [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Quill Corporation v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:16 am
In publishing notice of the restrictions, the United States included coins among the types of objects subject to protection (even though coins were not specifically included in the requests). [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:49 am
State, 984 So.2d 592, 598–99 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (quoting United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:10 pm
US v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:16 am
Yesterday evening the United States Department of Justice filed a statement in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:46 am
(Orin Kerr) According to this morning’s order list, the Supreme Court has agreed to review United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
The Section 215 telephony-metadata program serves the paramount government interest in preventing and disrupting terrorist attacks on the United States, a compelling special governmental need. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm
It’s the last two-week argument session of the Term, and today is the biggest of the last group of cases: United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 4:34 pm
The purpose of that concurring opinion is to express disagreement with the Ninth Circuit’s “mistaken belief”—stated most recently in United States v. [read post]
