Search for: "United States v. Sullivan"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,311
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:04 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 3:02 am
United States Bureau of Prisons, (8th Cir., Feb. 4, 2008), the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a Muslim inmate's free exercise, RFRA and RLUIPA claims. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:30 pm
Cabranes of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in 2017-2018. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 10:32 am
Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 7:46 am
United States, 915 F.2d 699, 712 (D.C. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
That's -- that's the view of the Government of the United States, as I understand. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:51 am
That's -- that's the view of the Government of the United States, as I understand. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:20 am
In 2009, Judge Emmet Sullivan of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia vacated the conviction of United States Senator Ted Stevens of Alaska after prosecutors failed to disclose exculpatory evidence. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 1:42 am
United States Congress: Is there Any Room for God? [read post]
29 May 2017, 7:31 am
’ United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
Phelps and United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
(stating that Court will not adopt Sullivan standard in Canada). [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 6:27 am
United States, in which the Court will decide “under what circumstances can the government retry for the underlying crime” “when a defendant is validly acquitted for a crime that involves another crime,”noting that “double jeopardy cases try to make sense out of the jury system—which often makes no sense. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:16 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:30 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:06 pm
(In United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 4:30 am
Here in the United States, Samsung is also running into IP trouble with its Galaxy tab. [read post]
