Search for: "United States v. Thomas Casey"
Results 1 - 20
of 162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
All the same, as the Chief Justice recognized in another case about overruling precedent—Citizens United v. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 4:22 am
Thus, whatever effect ordinary murders, or robbery, or gun possession might have on interstate commerce (or on any other subject of federal concern) was irrelevant to the question of congressional power....and...United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
Thomas graduated from Yale Law School in 1974, one year after the Court handed down Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 12:29 pm
Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 864 (1992). [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 8:27 am
Assn. of United States, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:58 am
Thomas is attacking the way Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:22 pm
Casey) or whether there is no right to abortion under the state constitution.] [read post]
7 May 2020, 1:06 pm
" United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
“Not much has changed” in the nearly 50 years since Roe and the 30 years since Casey, except that there have been numerous decisions reaffirming Roe and Casey, along with decades of reliance by women in the United States on those decisions, Kagan said. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
This imports the sequencing familiar in the Chevron context from United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 3:12 am
Yet, 26 states asked the court to overrule Roe and its successor, Casey. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
The decision by Justice Samuel Alito will set off a seismic shift in reproductive rights across the United States. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 8:55 am
Casey and signaling, for now, the end of a right to abortion in the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
The development of the birth control pill, which was first available in the United States in 1960, meant that women could engage in sexual activity with at least some protection against unwanted pregnancy. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 4:30 am
" This prohibition on federal courts enjoining state courts does not apply to Section 1983 suits because the Supreme Court has unequivocally held in Mitchum v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm
United States, which considered the separate-sovereigns exception to double jeopardy, Thomas wrote separately “to address the proper role of the doctrine of stare decisis. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
Ziegler investigates the journey from Roe v Wade, the constitutional right to abortion; through to the Hyde Amendment, a United States federal ban on abortion coverage for federally funded healthcare recipients, including women enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid; and the introduction of the undue burden standard from the Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992) United States Supreme Court decision. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 3:10 am
Joining [Pennsylvania state officials], the United States [government], as it has done in five other cases in the last decade, again asks us to overrule Roe. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
By Eric SegallThis was a no good, terrible, very bad year at the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
