Search for: "United States v. Thornton" Results 101 - 120 of 217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2020, 5:23 am by Derek T. Muller
Thornton and Chiafalo—the Constitution sets forth a framework to empower States to regulate federal elections. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 4:00 am by David Markus
United States, a Massachusetts case, the justices have been asked to determine whether they meant what they wrote about juries and drug sentences in Alleyne v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 8:09 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
United States, 510 U.S. 135, 147-48, 114 S.Ct. 655, 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994). [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm by Josh Blackman
The Colorado state trial court held that the President is not an "Officer of the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:39 am by Avery Schmitz
ET: The House Foreign Affairs Committee will hold a hearing to review the United States’ withdrawal from Afghanistan. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 7:57 am
United States did the Supreme Court find any authority in the “Times, Places and Manner” clause to regulate pre-election campaigning. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
First, the compatibility of United Kingdom corporate taxation with certain principles of EU law and the liabilities of the Revenue to a taxpayer who has overpaid tax on the basis of incompatible United Kingdom legislation. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Thornton, which barred the states from adding additional qualifications to federal offices. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 15 December, the Supreme Court will hear the case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v State of Libya. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:13 am by Marty Lederman
  Thankfully, no Justice wrote to give any credence at all to the absurd arguments that the President isn’t an “officer of the United States” or that the presidency isn’t an office “under the United States. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]