Search for: "United States v. Under Seal" Results 1 - 20 of 1,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2010, 5:46 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The United States’ opposition to the motion for preliminary injunction in Martin v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:08 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The United States today filed this notice of withdrawal of its previous motion to file under seal in Martin v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 4:26 am by Zachary C. Jackson
A new decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin reaffirms that the Circuit’s attitude against sealing is alive and well these days. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 7:27 am
  In a decision issued on June 11, 2009 in United States ex rel. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 2:08 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
’” Ctr. forAuto Safety, 809 F.3d at 1096 (quoting United States v.Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir. 1995)); see also ValleyBroad. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 1:21 am
US-FDIC-Seal.svg_.png In bank robbery trial, when copies of FDIC insurance certificates issued to victim bank were not self-authenticating under FRE 902(1) (because copies of the sealed documents were not the original sealed documents), the copies were admissible under FRE 1003 to prove the bank was federally insured when bank tellers testified that they recognized the copies of the certificates, the copies were dated before the robberies… [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:26 am by Zachary C. Jackson
A new decision from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin reaffirms that the Circuit’s attitude against sealing is alive and well these days. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:06 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Under his minute order, any reply in connection with the United States’ motion to file under seal must be filed no later than Friday. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 5:14 am
Keith Sealing (University of Louisville Brandeis School of Law) has posted State Sponsors of Terrorism are Entitled to Due Process Too: The Amended Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act is Unconstitutional on SSRN. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 8:21 am by The Federalist Society
Rigsby sued on behalf of the United States under the provisions of the federal False Claims Act (FCA), and continued to litigate the case after the United States declined to intervene. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:57 pm
The United States District Court stated that: The document is "an incomplete draft of an e-mail message" and "never was sent to anyone. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:57 pm
The United States District Court stated that: The document is "an incomplete draft of an e-mail message" and "never was sent to anyone. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 7:52 am by The Federalist Society
Rigsby sued on behalf of the United States under the provisions of the federal False Claims Act (FCA), and continued to litigate the case after the United States declined to intervene. [read post]