Search for: "United States v. United Mine Workers" Results 41 - 60 of 298
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2017, 7:43 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Toward the end of the Obama administration, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) added asbestos to a list of dangerous or hazardous chemicals. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 7:18 am by Daniel Hemel
United States, held that “Chevron appl[ies] with full force in the tax context. [read post]
22 May 2014, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that his severance agreement did not comply with the Older Worker Benefits Protection Act because it did not state that he should consult an attorney before signing, a federal district court in Colorado allowed a miner who alleged age and disability discrimination after being laid off to proceed with his ADEA and state law claims. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:18 pm
Feiock, 485 U.S. 624, 108 S.Ct. 1423, 99 L.Ed.2d 721 [1988]; International Union United Mine Workers of America v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:53 am by Simmons Hanly Conroy
Today, it is still legal to import, sell, and use raw asbestos and products containing asbestos in the United States. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Both served as Assistant United States Attorneys and as high-level aides to Attorneys General. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 1:00 am by Simmons Hanly Conroy
As news of asbestos-related diseases spread across the United States, the American public started to become increasingly suspicious of asbestos companies that had, for so long, denied the dangers of asbestos exposure. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]
Recall that Montana sought coverage for claims alleging it had failed to warn claimants of the dangers of asbestos exposures to workers at a mine operated by W. [read post]