Search for: "United States v. Vermont"
Results 221 - 240
of 871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Some of these activities spill over into the United States, and just in 2020, three men were arrested in Texas transporting illicit cigarettes. [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 3:26 am
United States (sentencing, plain error doctrine) Boyle v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Vermont Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:55 pm
As some U visa grantees first entered EWI, however the regulations state that they were lawfully admitted to the United States on the date the U visa is granted. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 12:55 pm
As some U visa grantees first entered EWI, however the regulations state that they were lawfully admitted to the United States on the date the U visa is granted. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 6:44 am
LoGiudice v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
In John Wiley & Sons Inc. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:37 pm
” Amestoy was the author of Baker v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 9:52 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 11:57 am
LLC – United States District Court – District of Vermont – August 1st, 2018) involves a premises liability claim. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 8:15 pm
In 1996, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in Daniel J. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:48 pm
" United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 8:01 am
In fact, this case is pretty similar to the Court’s speedy trial dictum, advanced only four years ago in Vermont v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:01 am
On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court overruled the “physical presence” bright-line rule for substantial nexus in its landmark decision South Dakota v. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 8:27 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:41 am
In an interview . . . the victim stated that someone had fraudulently attempted to apply for credit cards online using his name and identifying information and to change his address with the United States Postal Service. . . . [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 3:05 pm
The American Association of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and another group, the Arc of the United States, urged the Court to take the case of Briseno v. [read post]
