Search for: "United States v. W. T. Grant Co."
Results 81 - 100
of 657
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
This is significant because franchisors don’t pay franchisees for services. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
See Abbvie Deutschland GmbH & Co. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 7:52 am
Co. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
As my co-author (Akhil Amar) and I discuss in an Article forthcoming in The Supreme Court Review (a draft of which is available on SSRN here), recent attention concerning ISL theory may have been generated by members of the Supreme Court itself; four Justices, drawing on arguments advanced in the Bush v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 3:26 pm
Recall that Judge Smith would have granted rehearing en banc in the ACA case that became California v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 11:14 am
” Other cases cite Representative Kastenmeier’s statement that the law “specifically extends only to false and misleading speech that is encompassed within the ‘commercial speech’ doctrine developed by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 1:54 pm
See also Pope Manufacturing Co. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
The United States District Court for the District of Arizona granted CCRRG’s motion to compel arbitration and dismissed the action. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
For example, in 2020 the PTO denied registration to the mark TRUMP TOO SMALL in connection with T-shirts, even though the applicant argued that the mark was “political commentary about presidential candidate and president Donald Trump that the relevant consumer in the United States would not understand to be sponsored by, endorsed by, or affiliated with Donald Trump. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
But wouldn't it be devastating to a janitor as well? [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:03 pm
Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:30 pm
In support, Apple cites United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
And litigation of course deploys the coercive power of the state, even as it also accomplishes private goals. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:26 pm
Supreme Court on the Second Amendment to right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am
Finally, the court found "[t]he fact that the specific bequest to [Michael] is greater in the 2015 Will than in prior wills, leads this [c]ourt to the inescapable conclusion that Ms. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:25 am
” Decisions this Week United StatesG.W. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:22 am
That may be why the Solicitor General of the United States and private litigants quote from rehearing dissents when petitioning or fending off arguments in opposition to a petition. [read post]
