Search for: "United States v. Walker" Results 301 - 320 of 1,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
On the closely-related problem of license plates, see Walker v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Kara Loewentheil, Satanists, Scott Walker, & Contraception: A Partial Account of Hobby Lobby's Implications for State Law, (Harvard Law & Policy Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2015, Forthcoming).Robert J. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:39 pm by Unknown
United States (Sacred Sites; Oak Flat/Chi-chil Bildagoteel) Allegany Capital Enteprises, LLC v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm by Robin Frazer Clark
Now, the United States is facing a severe bicycle shortage as global supply chains, disrupted by the coronavirus outbreak, scramble to meet the surge in demand. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Anna Christensen
United States (09-5801) Respondent’s brief in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:11 pm by Schachtman
Delafontaine also has a website on the role of historians as expert witnesses in United States tobacco cases. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:01 pm
Walker More than three years after the State’s initial request, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“US EPA”) granted California’s request for a waiver to allow the state to enforce its greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emission standards for new motor vehicles. [read post]
21 Apr 2018, 9:53 am by Eugene Volokh
On October 10, 2017, I rejected the proffered plea agreement in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm by John Elwood
United States, 21-8190Issue: Whether the Supreme Court should overturn its decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Saraphin Dhanani
United States: “a crime that is similar to the listed examples in some respects but different in others. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:14 am by Joseph Riepenhoff
The beginning of this month marked the 45th anniversary of Thurgood Marshall’s term as Associate Justice in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:25 am
§ 11.01(16) is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 3 of the Wisconsin Constitution because its language "'is so sweeping that its sanctions may be applied to constitutionally protected conduct which the state is not permitted to regulate.'"  State v. [read post]