Search for: "United States v. Watkins" Results 141 - 160 of 255
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2012, 10:34 pm by Jeff Gamso
United States.The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am by Eugene Volokh
" This is similar to the standard offered by Jeff Wall, who argued for the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 10:01 pm by Josh Blackman
United States held that Congress cannot force states to enact legislation. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:19 am by Aidan O'Neill QC
   Despite some initial scepticism about the need or utility for reliance upon notions of common law constitutionalism in a post HRA/post EU Charter era (see for example Watkins v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 8:20 am
Assistant to the Solicitor General Patricia Millett will argue on behalf of the United States, which filed an amicus brief supporting vacatur in the Safeco case and reversal in GEICO. [read post]
21 May 2019, 1:53 pm by Margaret Taylor
United States as permitting “Congress to inquire into and publicize corruption, maladministration or inefficiency in agencies of the Government. [read post]
19 May 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Last Thursday, Judge Alsup issued an Order of Referral - a rare step in civil trade secrets cases - in which he referred the matter to the United States Attorney for possible criminal investigation.Judge Alsup also entered an order on Waymo's application for interim relief. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
At the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Devin Watkins writes that the court’s ruling in Gundy v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 4:39 am by Heidi Henson
” According to the lawsuits, the defendants trafficked over 500 Indian guestworkers to the United States after Hurricane Katrina and forced them to work for Signal under barbaric conditions. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
TCRR states that nothing in the postwar years hinted at the mass mobilizations that would soon be exploding into the national consciousness. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 4:46 pm
License Agreement and Asset Purchase Agreements Know-How Right of First Refusal Contract Interpretation Extrinsic Evidence of a Contemporaneous Oral Agreement Parol Evidence Rule Breach of Contract Equitable Estoppel DefenseIowa LawContract Drafting   Appeal from United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa – Central Wildhawk Investments, LLC (“Wildhawk”) initiated this breach of contract… [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:04 pm by Michael Froomkin
Watkins/Proctor & Gamble Professor of Law, The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law Nicole Porter, The Sentencing Project Panel III: The Criminalization of Immigration Law Since the Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in INS v. [read post]