Search for: "United States v. Wiley"
Results 121 - 140
of 394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
[Is the United States scaleable? [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 2:00 pm
United States Dietz v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
John Wiley & Sons, is a dispute over copyrighted textbooks produced overseas but imported to the United States and resold by Kirtsaeng without the publisher's permission. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 2:56 am
Commentary on United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 7:22 am
The case has been haunting the Court’s docket since the October Term 2011, when Supap Kirtsaeng filed a petition challenging the Second Circuit’s ruling that he was liable to John Wiley for reselling in the United States textbooks that he had purchased overseas. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 8:00 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:45 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 9:31 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 5:43 am
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
Int’l Trade Comm’n), the Federal Circuit ruled that a sale of a patented article outside the United States does not authorize the buyer to import the article back into the United States or sell the article within the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:12 am
Int’l Trade Comm’n), the Federal Circuit ruled that a sale of a patented article outside the United States does not authorize the buyer to import the article back into the United States or sell the article within the United States. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:31 am
§ 1498(a) provides that “the owner’s remedy shall be by action against the United States in the United States Court of Federal Claims for the recovery of his reasonable and entire compensation for such use and manufacture. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:41 pm
Lexmark sold some of the cartridges in the United States and some abroad. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:34 pm
LG Electronics; and that the sale outside of the United States of an article covered by a US patent does not exhaust the rights of the patent holder as against the purchaser of that article on the purchaser’s importation of that article into the United States, notwithstanding the 2013 copyright decision of the Supreme Court in Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 1:45 pm
John Wiley &Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 12:08 pm
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
He imported them into the United States. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
United States, 15-474, involving former Virginia governor Bob McDonnell’s challenge to his fraud conviction; and Trinity Lutheran Church of Columbia, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
In relevant part, § 1442(a)(1) provides that `[a] civil action . . . that is commenced in a State court’ may be removed to federal court if the action is against `any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States . . . for or relating to any act under color of such office. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:46 pm
There was nothing about United States v. [read post]
