Search for: "United States v. Worcester" Results 41 - 60 of 111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Aug 2012, 7:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
United States (1968) (391US404) — Treaty Rights Survived Termination v. (24) Oneida County v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
The lower federal courts held that abstention was proper and the case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 4:09 am
The lower federal courts held that abstention was proper and the case was appealed to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm by Tom Kosakowski
Retirements -- Several Ombuds announced their retirements last year, including:Jim Augustine, University of South CarolinaPaul Kuerbis, Colorado CollegeCraig Mousin, DePaul UniversityMerle Waxman, Yale University (2022) In Memoriam -- Colleagues remembered many Ombuds, including a beloved current and upcoming Ombuds, who passed away in 2023: Mary Childers, retired inaugural Ombuds at Dartmouth CollegeJanet Eckhouse, retired Health Care Ombuds Mediator at Kaiser PermanenteCurtis Grassman, retired… [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:42 am by Jeff Gamso
"This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.And it's been settled (although sometimes unsettling) since Marbury v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As illustrated by Marshall’s rebuke of Andrew Jackson and the state of Georgia in Cherokee Nation and Worcester v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But "[t]he condition of Indians in relation to the United States is perhaps unlike that of any two people in existence … marked by peculiar and cardinal distinctions that exist nowhere else," Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:23 am by gmlevine
The Panel found contrary to Complainant’s conclusory assertions [that it had been well-known throughout the United States and particularly to those in its industry] [] that the issue of bad faith presents a close question. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:31 pm by Kalvis Golde
United States 22-118Issues: (1) Whether the jury clauses of Article III and the Sixth Amendment or the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment bar a court from imposing a more severe criminal sentence on the basis of conduct that a jury necessarily rejected, given its verdicts of acquittal on other counts at the same trial; (2) whether the Supreme Court‘s decision in United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]