Search for: "United States v. a Motion Picture Film"
Results 1 - 20
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2017, 7:52 pm
In the first, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:28 am
By Scott HerveyOn October 31, 2005, adult film actress Mary Cook filed a trademark registration application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the mark MARY CAREY for motion pictures featuring adult entertainment, and a series of... [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:51 am
Motion Picture Patents Co. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 1:52 pm
” The decrees, a result of the landmark 1948 Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 11:03 am
Both the Fifth and Ninth Circuits, reviewing the provisions in Mexican law similar to those in Italy, found that the film producers could be and were the “authors” of the motion pictures in question, so that the restored rights vested in the producers, as authors, rather than the individual creators. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 11:29 am
They know it when they see it.For the fate of Congress's previous attempt, see United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
The Beijing Treaty provides a modern international framework for the rights of performers in motion pictures, television programs, and other audiovisual works, similar to that already in place for producers of such works, for authors, and for performers and producers of sound recordings, pursuant to other WIPO copyright treaties the United States has joined. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 5:57 am
Department of Justice in United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 10:31 am
"The demise of the MPPC happened in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 4:14 am
The parties agreed to arbitrate their dispute through the American Film Marketing Association (”AFMA”), a motion picture trade organization with its own arbitration rules and panel of arbitrators. [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 2:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:28 am
(Compl., 25-32.)Defendants move to dismiss the case for improper venue, or in the alternative, transfer the case to the United States District Court of Connecticut.Fragola v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 9:49 am
Millemann In Seven Arts Filmed Entertainment, Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 12:00 am
Arizona, et al., Petitioners v United States The Court decided by five votes to three that three of four provisions inArizona’s Senate Bill 1070 were null. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:23 am
If pursued, the DOJ’s probe could be the biggest antitrust hit taken by the movie theater industry since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 9:58 am
” The Dissent also found that there was no error in the finding that plaintiff made a work for hire, which doctrine “is important in the analysis of motion picture authorship because in the United States most contributions to a motion picture are created as works made for hire. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:22 am
The complaint, filed in New Mexico, says: 'Reviews of early screenings, together with trailers released in the United States, reveal that the motion picture uses the same elements from Conan Doyle's copyrighted stories.' The film is based on the book "A Slight Trick of the Mind" and the Author of the book Mitch Cullin, and his publisher Random House, are also named as defendants.A Slight Trick of the Mind is set… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:03 pm
This definitional conflict presents practical problems when United States courts, applying choice of law rules, apply foreign copyright laws through U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:03 pm
This definitional conflict presents practical problems when United States courts, applying choice of law rules, apply foreign copyright laws through U.S. [read post]
