Search for: "Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 1:07 am
Duke and State of New York v. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
At the same time, critics of the administrative state have called into question authority of administrative agencies to adjudicate claims in light of Article III’s command that “[t]he judicial power of the United States shall be vested” in courts. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm
See Dayton Area Visually Impaired Persons, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
Planned Parenthood of Gulf Coast, Inc. and Andersen v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
Trainmen v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
Ritzen Group Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Dukes and AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:43 am
This guide is a portion of United Cerebral Palsy's One-Stop Resource Guide. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:41 am
Universal Health Servs. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Harris Funeral Homes Inc v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 7:16 am
The Illinois / Chicago resource guide for individuals with cerebral palsy and special needs was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Town of Barnstable v. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
United States that Sheehan had a First Amendment right to continue publishing the classified material. [read post]
