Search for: "Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. United States"
Results 201 - 220
of 332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2015, 12:15 pm
United States, 14-150; potential blockbuster Friedrichs v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
Singga Enterprises (Canada) Inc.; Tory Burch LLC, et al. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:30 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:40 pm
Assuming the Administration follows appropriate procedures to adopt the rules, most legal commentators do not expect the legal challenges opposing the mandate orders to be successful in the courts particularly after the Supreme Court refused to overturn or hear arguments for overturning a unanimous decision of a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Klassen v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 8:28 am
In its most recent manifestations one sees the imposition of public pressure on the National Basketball Association and on Apple Inc. respecting their entanglement in Xinjiang that increasingly serves as the defining point for the difference between US and Chinese normative approaches to public governance; here and here). [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
United States, No. 13-7451, Slip op. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 3:16 pm
Garg v Macomb Mental Health, 472 Mich 263 (2005). [read post]
29 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
The association encourages its members to apply for the travel expense awards for employees of state or provincial health or agricultural departments in North America. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Oxford University historian Peter Bartrip, for one, noted that Selikoff had testified frequently. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Opp Health & Rehab. , LLC, 2024 Ala. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 9:58 am
From Wednesday's California Court of Appeal decision in Firefighters4Freedom v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
Lastly, United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:15 pm
While in law school, Dirk interned at Novant Health, Inc., a regional health care system, and also volunteered for two years as the Assistant Director of the Wake Forest Innocence Project where he worked on actual innocence claims and reintegration of recently released prisoners. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
The cases are Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
