Search for: "Universal Health Servs., Inc. v. United States"
Results 161 - 180
of 332
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
In Burwell v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:21 pm
These include digital forensic preservation and investigation, notification of a broad range of third parties and other constituencies,[1] fulfillment of state and federal compliance obligations, potential litigation, engagement with law enforcement, the provision of credit monitoring, crisis management, a communications plan – and the list goes on. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
First, a quick note on the government's new final rules regarding the religious accommodation (including its extension to some for-profit employers such as Hobby Lobby, Inc.). [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:40 am
United States, and a companion case, Sandlin v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Infante, a fellow of the white-hat conspiracy, Collegium Ramazzini, and an adjunct professor at George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am
Braun, 14-1123, and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Town of Barnstable v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
United States, No. 13-7451, Slip op. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
Here are some recent developments on the sexual orientation front: In June 2013, in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:38 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
In one instance, Greenland revisits one of his own cases, without any clear acknowledgment that his views were largely rejected.[6] The State of California had declared, pursuant to Proposition 65 ( the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, Health and Safety Code sections 25249.5, et seq.), that the State “knew” that di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, or “DEHP” caused cancer. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
Askari, M.D., Ph.D., an associate professor of hepatology, in the University of Michigan Health System. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 8:22 am
United Parcel Service, Inc. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
That discussion serves as the basis for considering the underlying normative framework that produces these vertically arranged systems of law. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 pm
Servs., Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
Oxford University historian Peter Bartrip, for one, noted that Selikoff had testified frequently. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Because RFRA was sold as a benign law and religion has been sold for decades in the United States as a benign force. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 11:34 am
AVENTURA TENNIS, LLC, INC., Appellee. 3rd District.Injury LawAdams, et al. v. [read post]
