Search for: "VENUS v. UNITED STATES" Results 101 - 120 of 1,560
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2023, 2:48 pm by Gabriel Chin
As Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 8:28 am by Eric Goldman
  But it was not a claim filed by Oppenheimer, but a claim referred to the CCB from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 4:03 pm by Jack Chin
United States is a venue case; I wrote about the venue issue at SCOTUSBlog. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm by Gabriel Chin
And there seems to be no dispute that in the United States now a venue error is waivable. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 10:47 am by centerforartlaw
For example, the United States’s general copyright duration is 70 years after the death of the author, and Mexico’s duration is 100 years after the death of the author. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Anuja Chowdhury
Frozen have sufficient contacts with the United States to satisfy that standard. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 2:40 am by Florian Mueller
The issue has also widened because the DOJ and the same state AGs as in the litigation that was originally started by Epic brought a motion for sanctions in the United States et al. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Saraphin Dhanani
District Court for the District of Columbia handed down an opinion in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 9:25 pm by Josh Blackman
REUVENI: The United States thinks Your Honor can be fair and impartial. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 5:16 am by Eugenia Lostri, Stephanie Pell
Pillar II: Disrupt and Dismantle Threat Actors As the new strategy begins by recognizing the range of significant threats posed by malicious actors, Pillar II opens with the statement: “The United States will use all instruments of national power to disrupt and dismantle threat actors whose actions threaten our interests. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm by Guest Author
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar’s argument in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:18 am by DONALD SCARINCI
United States, 575 U.S. 723 (2015), but ultimately decided the case before reaching the constitutional issue. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:57 am by Roger Parloff
I described then the legal landscape in which their motions to transfer venue are playing out, which is largely set by the District of Columbia Circuit’s binding, en banc 1976 ruling in United States v. [read post]