Search for: "VILLAGE v. JONES"
Results 41 - 60
of 117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Village of Endicott, 28 AD3rd 923 (3rd Dep't 2006); Della Rocco v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Village of Endicott, 28 AD3rd 923 (3rd Dep't 2006); Della Rocco v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
Jones v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
Jones Jones LLC, New York City (David Secemski of counsel), for New York City Transit Authority, respondent. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 pm
Jones Jones LLC, New York City (David Secemski of counsel), for New York City Transit Authority, respondent. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:12 am
Village of Bradford, 245 F.3d 869, 874 (6th Cir. 2001). [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
The other referenced tags remind me of what the Ninth Circuit wrote in Perfect 10 v. ccBill (in the copyright context): “When a website traffics in pictures that are titillating by nature, describing photographs as ‘illegal’ or ‘stolen’ may be an attempt to increase their salacious appeal, rather than an admission that the photographs are actually illegal or stolen. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 6:24 am
’ The case is Jones v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 12:10 pm
Removal of an officer of a political subdivision of the State for misconduct, maladministration, malfeasance or malversation in officeMatter of Hedman v Town Bd. of Town of Howard, 2008 NY Slip Op 09229, decided on November 21, 2008, Appellate Division, Fourth Department Gerald S. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 6:09 am
* §36 requires that the officer be notified of the fact that an application seeking his or her removal, together with a copy of the allegations, to be served on the official at least eight days prior to the filing of the application with the court. ** In Jones v Filkins, 238 AD2d 954, the Appellate Division indicated that removal of an individual from public office is appropriate in situations involving “self-dealing, corrupt activities, conflict of interest, moral… [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:02 am
Jones, Jr. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 7:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:11 am
Harrow Community Support Ltd v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:44 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:27 pm
Perhaps Jones should be read as implicitly or explicitly rejecting the mosaic approach. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
Pitkin v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 6:06 am
Jones, 2013-Ohio-3559 (6th Dist.) [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:21 pm
Instead, it held that it must rely upon the Eleventh Circuit's explicit holding that a Jones Act claim is subject to arbitration in Bautista v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 3:00 am
Chalet Village Properties, Inc., No. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 4:56 pm
" People v. [read post]
