Search for: "Vaccaro v. Vaccaro" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2012, 10:24 am by Michael McCann
 The players' attorneys say Vaccaro criticized the NCAA long before this suit, and that the NCAA hasn't denied investigating Vaccaro and now wants to accuse him of improprieties. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:47 am by Lon Sobel
Sonny Vaccaro has done a lot of things over the course of his storied sports career. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 1:38 pm
Vaccaro v Vaccaro 2011 NY Slip Op 02865 Decided on April 5, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department Husband appealed from the decision of the supreme court to deny, without a hearing,  his motion for modification of visitation and deny him a judgment for arrears on child care expenses, medical expenses, and the cost of obtaining a certificate of occupancy [...] [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 10:35 am by Ryan McKeen
“We are pleased with the judge’s decision as this is the victory for the public,” Vaccaro said in a press release. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
An individual wishing to withdraw or rescind his or her resignation after delivery to the appointing authority must fully comply with all relevant rules and regulations Vaccaro v Board of Educ. of the City Sch. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:45 am by Randy Barnhart
In January of this year, the Colorado Court of Appeals decided Vaccaro v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 3:00 pm by Michael McCann
Libby Sander has an extensive and thoughtful article on Sonny Vaccaro and O'Bannon v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that the Department of Education's action was not arbitrary and capricious, noting that "[J]udicial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations is a basic tenet of administrative law," citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, and that it had previously ruled that "DOE employees must 'strictly' comply with the procedures set forth in Chancellor's Regulation C 205," citing Matter of… [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court explained that the Department of Education's action was not arbitrary and capricious, noting that "[J]udicial deference to an agency's interpretation of its own regulations is a basic tenet of administrative law," citing Andryeyeva v New York Health Care, Inc., 33 NY3d 152, and that it had previously ruled that "DOE employees must 'strictly' comply with the procedures set forth in Chancellor's Regulation C 205," citing Matter of… [read post]