Search for: "Vaughn v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2018, 3:30 am by Coleman Saunders
The defense made several additional arguments for the abatement, relying upon the factors in United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon… [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 3:08 am by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
Because the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA’) airspace redesign projects throughout the United States have apparently negatively impacted hundreds of thousands, even millions, of people, and because we have received a number of requests for a discussion of the bases for the currently pending challenge to the FAA’s SoCal Metroplex airspace redesign project, a copy of the Opening Brief of Petitioners City of Culver City, California; Santa Monica Canyon… [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 7:51 am by Alan S. Kaplinsky
United States, 520 U.S. 651, 657, 117 S.Ct. 1573, 137 L.Ed.2d 917 (1997) (‘Ordinarily, where a specific provision conflicts with a general one, the specific governs. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 10:33 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Hawk, 855 S.W.2d 573 (Tenn. 1993) and the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Troxel v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:52 am
  Id.at 201,108 S.Ct. at 2347 (citing United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:15 am by Alex Loomis, Quinta Jurecic
Stay motion Judge Spath moves on to the defense’s “motion to abate pending the resolution of the United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:48 pm by Schachtman
In a Litigation magazine article, Gregory Joseph sets out some strong reasons to consider for not conducting depositions of expert witnesses under the revised 2010 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP). [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 9:00 am
On that same date, the United States Supreme Court issued the landmark Windsor v. [read post]