Search for: "Vaughn v. United States"
Results 41 - 60
of 165
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm
Vaughn v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 7:20 pm
The petition of the day is: Vaughn v. [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
That’s Constitutional Law I/Marbury v. [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 3:13 am
This suggests that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito – all of whom voted to uphold the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:41 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 12:08 pm
United States, __ A.3d __ (D.C. 2014). [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:35 am
See New York Times Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am
District Judge Vaughn Walker striking down California’s ban on same-sex marriage, noting that although the Supreme Court later “chose to speak on gay marriage through a narrower case, ruling only that the federal government must recognize marriages solemnized under state law,” since then the lower courts “have been reading the [United States v.] [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
It particularly refers to the practice of pursuing a case in England and Wales, in preference to other jurisdictions, such as the United States, which provide more extensive defences for those accused of making derogatory statements. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Judge Newman further challenges Jaffer, reiterating his contention that a Vaughn index is too vague to be useful and stating that this case is primarily about the OLC-DOD memo. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 8:55 am
In the lower court, Judge Colleen McMahon rejected efforts by the ACLU and Times to unearth even the existence of legal analysis supporting the targeted killing program, upholding the government’s Glomar and “no number, no list” responses in which it respectively refused to confirm or deny the existence or nonexistence of some records to the Times and declined to provide a Vaughn index enumerating other records to the ACLU under FOIA exemptions 1, 3, and 5. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
Just as Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:41 am
United States [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:34 am
Brown)United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
And in Lawrence v. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:30 am
Schwarzenegger (now Hollingsworth v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:50 am
District Court Judge Vaughn R. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm
In the March 20, 2013 opinion in SCDSS v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 7:09 am
United States, 690 F.2d 966 (D.C. [read post]
