Search for: "Vazquez v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 82
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2011, 5:56 am by Susan Brenner
In reviewing the case, the Supreme Court first noted that it had “repeatedly held that a statute violates the due process clauses of both the Illinois and United States Constitutions if it potentially subjects wholly innocent conduct to criminal penalty without requiring a culpable mental state beyond mere knowledge. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:10 pm by Kristin Michelle Ekert
 Jose Padilla, a legal permanent U.S. resident who lived in the United States for 40 years, had been wrongly told by his attorney that although he wasn’t a citizen, he would not be deported if he pleaded guilty to a drug charge. [read post]
23 May 2017, 4:32 am by Guest Blogger
Special factors did not counsel hesitation, even where a foreign national sought recompense for the misconduct of U.S. officials outside the United States. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:36 am by Andrew Livingston
  At the request of the Ninth Circuit, the California Supreme Court will decide whether Dynamex applies retroactively in Vazquez v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:56 pm by Duncan Hollis
 These treaties, however, represent a clear counter-example to my claim; the U.K., Australia and the United States all expressly recorded their mutual understanding of how the United States would regard these treaties as a matter of domestic law. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
The mother alleged that she was not able to return to the United States until 2019, after she signed a divorce agreement in the presence of the father and several other men, all of whom were carrying weapons, including firearms and traditional swords. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 4:56 am by Susan Brenner
U.S., 267 U.S. 132 (1925), the rationale for the border search exception is that the United States – like other sovereign countries – is entitled to stop travelers at the border and search them and their belongings to ensure that contraband is not being brought into or taken out of the country. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
He therefore directed an election in a unit limited to VMT technicians. [read post]