Search for: "Vazquez v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2011, 9:52 am
United States (10-5296) and Vazquez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 4:30 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:49 am
United States, 10-5296, and Vazquez v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
United States, 10-5296, and Vazquez v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 9:56 pm
These treaties, however, represent a clear counter-example to my claim; the U.K., Australia and the United States all expressly recorded their mutual understanding of how the United States would regard these treaties as a matter of domestic law. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:44 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:29 am
In the second panel of the day, which was chaired by Yolanda Vazquez, one speaker described the “iceberg” of cases in the United States that never even get heard because the parties involved cannot hire legal representation. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:10 pm
Jose Padilla, a legal permanent U.S. resident who lived in the United States for 40 years, had been wrongly told by his attorney that although he wasn’t a citizen, he would not be deported if he pleaded guilty to a drug charge. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 12:11 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:30 am
The case of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:17 am
In United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
State of Tennessee, No. 06-6208 In civil rights suit alleging that city police discriminated against plaintiffs in violation of the Ame [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 2:22 pm
Lopez-Vazquez v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2007, 7:11 am
This list was assembled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
23 Nov 2007, 12:26 am
United States
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 10:10 pm
United States v. [read post]
