Search for: "Velasquez v. United States" Results 21 - 40 of 45
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 May 2019, 9:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
In Palencia v Perez, 2019 WL 1907867 (11th Cir., 2019) the district court concluded that Marilys Velasquez Perez had wrongfully retained her son, H.J.D.V., in the United States and away from Guatemala, his place of habitual residence. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
The Court of Appeal grantd the newspaper's writ petition, finding the order an impermissible prior restraint violative of both the United States and California Constitutions. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:43 am
Contrary to Reich's arguments, the fact that it was purportedly not the attorney of record at the time of a hearing before the United States Bankruptcy Court to determine whether the particular asset at issue qualified as an exemption, is not dispositive of the existence of an attorney-client relationship during the period of the alleged negligence. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 10:39 am by Aaron
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/12/10/08-10436.pdf United States v. [read post]
10 May 2015, 5:48 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Velasquez, 332 S.W.3d 367 (Tex. 2011), summarizes general Texas immunity law: Under Texas law, a suit against a government employee in his official capacity is a suit against his government employer with one exception: an action alleging that the employee acted ultra vires. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:00 pm
United California Bank (1972) 23 Cal.App.3d 850, which held that, where the complaint states a cause of action in someone, but not in the plaintiff, a general demurrer for failure to state a cause of action will be sustained. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 5:18 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) explains: In many Latin American countries, the term “notario publico” (for “notary public”) stands for something very different than what it means in the United States. [read post]
24 May 2011, 7:34 am by Aaron Pelley
” http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/839921.opn.pdf State v. [read post]