Search for: "Village of Freeport v. Barrella" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2016, 11:18 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a case involving both 42 USC §1981 and Title VII, a panel of the Second Circuit in its opinion in Village of Freeport v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The term “race” includes ethnicity for purposes of 42 USC 1981 and Title VIIVillage of Freeport and Andrew Hardwick v Barrella, USCA, Second Circuit, No. 14-2270-cv (L) et. al.Christopher Barrella sued the Village of Freeport and its former mayor, Andrew Hardwick, [Hardwick] alleging Hardwick violated 42 USC 1981, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC 2000e, and the New York State Human Rights Law, New York Executive Law… [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 10:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The term “race” for purposes of 42 U.S.C. 1981 is to be defined the same as the term “race” is defined for the purposes of Title VIIVillage of Freeport v Barrella. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:27 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Since that kind of opinion testimony is prohibited under the rules of evidence, the Village gets a new trial.The case is Village of Freeport v. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 6:05 am by Joy Waltemath
However, the appeals court vacated the award and ordered a new trial since the district court erroneously allowed former administrators to provide lay opinion testimony in which they “nakedly” speculated that the mayor considered race in his appointments (Village of Freeport v. [read post]