Search for: "Von Edwards v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2012, 5:03 pm
” In Von Hannover v Germany (2005) 40 EHRR 1 the European Court of Human Rights exposed the flaw in the A v B approach: 63. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 7:12 am
VONS is the Czech acronym for Výbor na obranu nespravedlivě stíhaných (Committee for the Defence of the Unjustly Persecuted): “The committee was founded on April 27, 1978, by a group of Charter 77 signatories [among whom were Václav Havel and Jan Patočka, the latter having died of a stroke ‘after a long and intense interrogation by the secret police’ before the committee was formed] with the aim of following… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Supreme Court upheld Indiana's photo identification law from constitutional challenge in Crawford v. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 4:46 am
In the National Review, Hans von Spakovsky and Elizabeth Slattery discuss Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 12:08 pm
Kamina, V. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
Inforrm ran several pieces: Case Law: Von Hannover v Germany (No.2) – Unclear clarification and unappreciated margins – Kirsten Sjøvoll Case Law: Axel Springer v Germany, Grand Chamber finds violation of Article 10 – Sara Mansoori News: Axel Springer and Von Hannover – Victory for the Media in the Grand Chamber As reported by the UK Human Rights Blog, the ECHR has rejected an application by Times Newspapers for its conviction for… [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:52 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Edward Dancy v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
Edward L. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
Evenwel v. [read post]
24 Aug 2013, 12:52 pm
And, relying on Dixon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 6:50 am
Nevertheless, having considered the chain of title and following Edwards Lifesciences v Cook Biotech [2009] EWHC 1340 (Pat), in which the court held that to make a valid claim for priority as successor in title it is necessary to be a successor in title at the time of filing the application, and KCI v Smith & Nephew [2010] EWHC 1487 (Pat), in which the court held that “successor in title” includes a person who was a recipient of the beneficial interest in… [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
Corp. v Von Gutfeld, 80 NY2d 130]. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 1:30 pm
The decision in Reidel v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 8:20 am
The law in this regard was summarised by Arnold J in Jarden Consumer Solutions (Europe) Ltd v SEB SA [2014] EWHC 445 (Pat) at [103]: “[103] As Kitchin LJ and Sir Robin Jacob said in their joint judgment in Gedeon Richter plc v Bayer Pharma AG[2012] EWCA Civ 235, [2013] Bus LR D17 at [61], ‘it is trite law that… the older (from the priority date of a patent under attack) a piece of prior art said to render a patent obvious, the harder it is to show… [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Dental Ass’n, 139 F.3d 598 (1998) (en banc) (Tatel, J., dissenting) (along with Edwards, C.J., and Wald and Rogers, JJ., joining opinion arguing that intentional sex discrimination is sufficient to justify punitive damage award), rev’d, 527 U.S. 526 (1999). [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
Briefly: At Law360 (subscription required), Edward Zelinsky looks at Dawson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, RESPONDENT CARL ERIC OLSEN, INTERVENOR EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge: There is a serious debate in the United States over the efficacy of marijuana for medicinal uses. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, RESPONDENT CARL ERIC OLSEN, INTERVENOR EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge: There is a serious debate in the United States over the efficacy of marijuana for medicinal uses. [read post]
