Search for: "W. T. Grant Co., in Re"
Results 61 - 80
of 727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2014, 10:00 am
Bristol Myers Squibb Co., 2014 U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
One of the most shocking extensions granted by registration is nationwide priority, even if you are really only using the mark in NY. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am
The trial court granted summary judgment. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 11:22 am
Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., 659 F. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 7:59 pm
” In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litig., 703 F.3d 511, 519 (Fed. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 6:51 pm
The item to which Andrew Sullivan links in Here We Go is slashdotted, so I don’t know what this is all about, but other people seem to be seriously tantalized. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 2:25 am
Gannett Co. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
13 May 2011, 5:00 am
Circuit splits tend to correlate with Supreme Court grants of review, but given what w mentioned about about the appeal being a long shot on the merit, we wouldn't be surprised if the plaintiffs simply folded their tent instead. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 2:40 pm
While it remains true that our role in bringing about the Buckman Co. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 5:47 pm
Posted by: Andrew W. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 10:44 am
In re Taxman Clothing Co., 49 F.3d 310, 315 (7th Cir. 1995); In re Central Ice Cream Co., 836 F.2d 1068, 1072 (7th Cir. 1987). [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
” That wasn’t so bad, by Relist Watch standards. [read post]
Interpreting plant provisions of the ESA, 9th Circuit shows restraint, encourages FWS to adopt rules
31 Aug 2010, 5:01 pm
” Steel Co. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 1:15 pm
Brian W. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
" We disagree with that because we don't see Kent as in any way an "extension" of Buckman Co. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
We’re just getting star [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
W. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Preliminary injunction granted. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
Harry Nace Co., 890 F.2d 181 (9th Cir. 1989) (finding no preclusion). [read post]
