Search for: "WARNER-LAMBERT CO V US"
Results 1 - 20
of 128
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2007, 6:00 am
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2006), cert. granted sub. nom Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 11:38 am
Ever since the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Warner Lambert v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
On Tuesday, the Court granted certiorari in No. 06-1498, Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 12:59 pm
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006)? [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 2:33 pm
The first wave of defense briefing is now complete in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 6:47 am
What is interesting to this Kat is that of course it would have been open to Pfizer/Warner-Lambert to go to the EPO and seek the same amendment using the central limitation procedure. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 4:59 am
Warner-Lambert, 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006) (which became Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 6:30 am
The case is Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 3:41 pm
Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat) is the latest in a series of decisions in the ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a generic version of Lyrica. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 12:44 am
John Collins, Sumer Dayal and Natalie ShoolmanClayton Utz by John Collins, Natalie Shoolman & Sumer Dayal On 21 October 2016, the Federal Court of Australia handed down its judgment in the case of Apotex Pty Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company LLC (No 2) [2016] FCA 1238 (FCA Judgment). [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:58 pm
Just over a year ago, AIPPI hosted a Rapid Response seminar following Mr Justice Arnold finding that the material claims of Warner-Lambert’s patent for the use of pregabalin in the treatment of pain were invalid and in any event not infringed by Actavis’ skinny label pregabalin product Lecaent (Warner-Lambert v Actavis [2015] EWHC 2548 (Pat)). [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:43 pm
Warner Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), aff’d by equally divided court, 552 U.S. 440 (2008), attempting to distinguish Buckman Co. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 12:23 pm
.* Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 4: harmony between parties in ‘lyrical’ patent disputeLast Thursday, Jeremy reported a High Court Order obtained by Warner-Lambert (part of the Pfizer group) mandating the NHS to release guidance about the prescribing of pregabalin (Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group PTC EHF & Others[2015] EWHC 485 (Pat) (02 March 2015)) [on which see the IPKat earlier posts, here and… [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:47 pm
Also, the court held that this threshold determination does not depend on the ultimate merits of the claims.However, the court affirmed the ruling as to the lack of ripeness of the infringement claim, citing its holding in Warner-Lambert Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 3:22 pm
On Monday this Kat posted "When litigants must be responsible -- and what happens when they're not: Lyrica pregabalin injunction is continued" (here), this being a short note on the decision of Mr Justice Arnold in Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Sandoz GmbH, Sandoz Ltd and Lloyds Pharmcacy Ltd [2015] EWHC 3153 (Pat), in the Patents Court, England and Wales, to extend an interim injunction in an ongoing patent infringement dispute over pregabalin, a… [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
Warner–Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2007), presumed to know more about Michigan law than either the Michigan courts (Taylor v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
**********PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever Too Late 73 [week ending on Sunday 22 November] – Xmas present from Benelux PTO | Eponia never ending troubles | Prof Dr Siegfried Broß v EPO | Protection of formats in the Netherlands | Eponia never ending proceedings | UK intensifies its Cracking Ideas programme | Anne Frank's Diary copyright | Transport for London and IP | CJEU in SBS Belgium v SABAM Case… [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:29 pm
Cir. 2012) (citing Warner-Lambert Co. v.Apotex Corp., 316 F.3d 1348, 1356 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
Almost all of these updates have been compiled and crafted by our good friend and dedicated colleague Alberto Bellan, to whom the IPKat and Merpel raise their paws in a respectful and grateful salute.Don't forget: there's also a mini-summary at the bottom of the post that lists the features carried by this weblog over the previous month.Last week's substantive Katposts look like this:* Swiss claims: a Kat reflects on the Warner-Lambert v Actavis… [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
The patent belongs Warner-Lambert, a company that was acquired by Pfizer in 2000. [read post]
