Search for: "WELLS v. EDWARDS" Results 21 - 40 of 2,363
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 9:36 am by Eric Goldman
Courts have invalidated or limited the scope of perpetuity provisions in other contexts as well. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:47 am by Dan Bressler
This reiterates the age-old lesson that solicitors must not prioritise their own interest (or the interests of one client at the expense of another) otherwise they risk incurring liability for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty, as well as possible regulatory exposure. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am by INFORRM
On 8 January 2024, the High Court of Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Kelly v O’Doherty [2024] NIMaster 1 [pdf]. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 8:35 am by Samuel Bray
And the Court just granted cert in another equity case, Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 5:51 am by Myles Jelf (Bristows)
A further set of complications as between validity and infringement arose in Edwards v Meril, this time not courtesy of the CMS. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm by Reference Staff
” The authors discuss nearly two-hundred cases including the well-known, such as Korematsu v. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
One of them, Edward DuMont, had argued the Jones case, so that put the pressure on. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm by Aaron Moss
Well, the U.K. copyright actually did expire in 1987, but one year later, the British Parliament introduced a unique exception to the Copyright Designs and Patents Act of 1988 in favor of the Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 3:30 am by Edward Rubin
Edward Rubin The Roberts Court may well overturn the Chevron doctrine this Term, despite the affection for stare decisis that Chief Justice Roberts himself expressed in the related case of Kisor v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
  The petitioners – including Intel, Edwards Lifesciences Corp., and Edwards Lifesciences LLC – brought suit alleging that the Fintiv rule exceeds the PTO’s statutory authority under the America Invents Act (AIA) and is arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). [read post]