Search for: "WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION"
Results 161 - 177
of 177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
It’s time for Volume IV! [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
By:David A. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
Patent it – Citigroup’s patent on ‘synthetic currency transaction network’ (IP ADR Blog) USPTO seeks National Medal of Technology and Innovation nominations (Daily Dose of IP) US Patents – Decisions ITC: Initial determination in LG’s favour in Whirlpool fridge patent case (ITC 337 Law Blog) (Law360) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amsted Industries – ITC denies motion to quash… [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
Chennai Live 104.8 FM asks the Madras High Court: Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd & Ors v Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Chennai & Ors (Spicy IP) Bombay High Court: Use of inventions for government purposes: Garware Wall Ropes v A I Chopra Engineers & Contractors, Konkan Railway Corporation (IP Frontline) Beware Mumbaikers: The Slumlord’s Act could detain you for a year for simply buying a pirated DVD (Spicy IP) (At Last... the 1709… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:52 am
Whirlpool Corp, the trial court did, however, permit the plaintiff to conduct a supplemental deposition of the defense expert witness to question him about his calculations[15]. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
At its Conference on February 21, 2014, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as rights of eighteen- to twenty-year-olds under the Second Amendment, police use of nontrivial force against a passively resisting arrestee, Federal Power Act requirements for interstate electric rates, preemption of local ordinances banning renting housing to illegal aliens, and whether hosting poker games is a federal felony. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 4:11 am
I had the privilege of appearing in some cases under SARFAESI Act, 2002 both for the Banks and also for the debtors/guarantors. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 11:29 pm
I had the privilege of appearing in some cases under SARFAESI Act, 2002 both for the Banks and also for the debtors/guarantors. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
Hermetic Seal Corporation, 4232 Temple City Blvd. in Rosemead, was fined $28,000. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: (IPRoo), Review of National Innovation System – Key points for corporate counsel: (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), Review of National Innovation System recommends creative commons: (creativecommons.org), Review of Innovation System released: (IP Menu News), What [right]’s in a [business] name: Westpac Banking Corporation v McMillan & Melbas On The Park Pty Ltd (formerly Credit Systems Australia Pty Ltd): (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), Senator Kim Carr… [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:42 am
The “professional identity” of designer is new.Dinwoodie: it was a list of things that rent-seeking industries in the UK sought and received protection for, and eventually the list was called “design” (cutlery, pottery, etc.).McKenna: Whirlpool& [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Seventh Trademark Scholars Roundtable: The Construction of the Consumer in Trade Mark Law Session 1: Roles for the Consumer in Trade Mark LawWhat role does the “consumer” (whether “average” or “reasonable” or otherwise) play in trade mark law? [read post]
12 May 2015, 2:43 pm
Inc. 06366QN86 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Deere & Company 06366QN94 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Moodys Corporation 06366QP27 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to CBS Corp. 06366QP35 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Schlumberger, Ltd. 06366QP43 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Amazon.com, Inc. 06366QP68 Bank of Montreal Reverse Exchangeable Notes linked to Whirlpool… [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 9:44 am
Though right to property is not a fundamental right, the Supreme Court has highlighted the significance of right to property as it is a Constitutional Right and the relevant observation of the Supreme Court in Karnataka State Financial Corporation Vs. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:11 am
Though right to property is not a fundamental right, the Supreme Court has highlighted the significance of right to property as it is a Constitutional Right and the relevant observation of the Supreme Court in Karnataka State Financial Corporation Vs. [read post]
5 Feb 2015, 4:13 am
“Claren Corporation”, 6/03/2014 (4-0). [read post]
