Search for: "WHITE v. STATE ex rel." Results 1 - 20 of 323
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am by Eugene Volokh
What they did have in common was a goal: to keep President-elect Lincoln from the White House. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 3:01 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
First, this authority will allow the Commission to protect consumers, including by issuing straightforward, clear rules to prevent Internet service providers from engaging in practices harmful to consumers, competition, and public safety, and by establishing a uniform, national regulatory approach rather than disparate requirements that vary state-by-state. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
” By itself, the order was not especially concerning; it urged agencies to preserve competition while exercising their authority and to stay in touch with the White House. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
” Accordingly, as this Court’s early decisions inter- preting the Equal Protection Clause explained, the Fourteenth Amendment guaranteed “that the law in the States shall be the same for the black as for the white; that all persons, whether colored or white, shall stand equal before the laws of the States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
” Accordingly, as this Court’s early decisions inter- preting the Equal Protection Clause explained, the Fourteenth Amendment guaranteed “that the law in the States shall be the same for the black as for the white; that all persons, whether colored or white, shall stand equal before the laws of the States. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
DorfMy latest Verdict column examines the all-but-endorsement of the unitary executive theory by Justices Thomas, Kavanaugh, and Barrett in Friday's SCOTUS decision in United States ex rel Polansky v. [read post]