Search for: "WILLIAM T. KING, INC." Results 121 - 140 of 179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2021, 5:16 pm by David Kopel
Supreme Court has granted certiorari to hear a major case on the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
Harbut, Peter Infante, William E. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Think Tank) IEEE patent scorecard for 2008 is out (Innovationpartners) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Patent databases: 2008 in review (Patent Librarian's Notebook) New kind codes for republished PCT documents (Patent Librarian’s Notebook) The model changes at PatentFreedom; Matsushita is top troll target (IAM) Patent litigation, the ITC, and hardship in the chip industry (IP finance)   Global - Copyright Public domain day 2009 (Creative Commons), (Michael Geist)… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am by Schachtman
One of Selikoff’s great achievements, the federalization of worker safety and health in the Williams-Steiger Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970,3 languishes because of inadequate resources for enforcement and frivolous efforts to address non-existent problems, such as the lowering of the crystalline silica permissible exposure limit. [read post]
2 May 2012, 5:52 am by Rob Robinson
Georgetown Law Rolls Out the ‘Law Firm Pronunciation Guide - bit.ly/KoaqON (Bruce Carton) Global Aerospace Inc. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Intellectual Property The General Court declined to register the word mark “F–KING AWESOME” on the basis that it was not sufficiently distinctive to be registered as a trademark in the EU. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:47 am
He was promised, according to court papers, a five percent a week return -- the kind of performance that would make even Ponzi king Bernard Madoff blush. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
Clarus Medical (laser) Deposition2005-07-11 Williams v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Thus, for instance, the government cannot "afford[] a greater degree of protection to commercial than to noncommercial speech," Metromedia, Inc. v. [read post]