Search for: "WILLIAMS v. NORTH CAROLINA" Results 21 - 40 of 747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2016, 3:37 am by SHG
Disagree with North Carolina’s law all you want, but at least its law reflected the will of its legislature, for better or worse. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
Woodruff, North Carolina Family Law Specialist Winston Salem, North Carolina: Malecek v. [read post]
20 Sep 2017, 12:58 pm by Woodruff Family Law Group
Woodruff, North Carolina Family Law Specialist Winston Salem, North Carolina: Malecek v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 1:11 pm
There isn't much out there in the way of a road map from North Carolina's state courts on how lawyers should fulfill their obligations to produce electronically stored information. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 6:07 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
In 1980, the North Carolina Supreme Court heard the matter of Williams v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 am by Amy Howe
The “independent state legislature” theory first made an appearance at the Supreme Court in a concurring opinion by then-Chief Justice William Rehnquist in Bush v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 6:23 am by Joel R. Brandes
His expenses included the costs Petitioner incurred flying to North Carolina and back to the Republic of Ireland along with the costs of his lodging in North Carolina ($2,648.63), the costs Petitioner incurred flying E.L.W.J. from North Carolina to the Republic of Ireland ($844.30), and the cost of Petitioner's rental car in North Carolina ($481.93). [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 12:31 pm by Greensboro Legal Blog
Williams, Jr. and Civil Right Section Chair, Michele Luecking-Sunman for a FREE Symposium commemorating the 60th anniversary of Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:45 am by Greg Herman-Giddens
Williams, a recent North Carolina Court of Appeals case (adapted from today's NAELA eBulletin): Plaintiff sued defendant as attorney-in-fact for decedent, alleging that an addendum and payment agreement release entered into between decedent and defendant regarding the sale of decedent’s property were void and unenforceable. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 4:38 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
North Carolina, the Supreme Court proscribed the use of mandatory death sentences.... [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 11:40 am
North Carolina, No. 13-633, have been held for months. [read post]