Search for: "WITHERS v. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 259
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2012, 2:00 am
” Professor Ann Conaway, in her withering critique of Chancellor Strine’s decision (read here), presents the argument against reading into Section 18-1104 the incorporation of traditional fiduciary duties. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 10:41 pm
In Acosta v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:11 am
& Ors v HX Investments Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 708 (31 May 2012) Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd v Apple Inc [2012] EWCA Civ 729 (30 May 2012) De Brito & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 709 (30 May 2012) QEB Metallics Ltd v Peerzada & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 728 (30 May 2012) AL (Albania) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 710 (30 May 2012) HM Revenue and Customs… [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:08 am
Congress enacted the CRA in response to the United States Supreme Court decision, in INS v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
For more information on the ownership, the evolution of Texas water rights, and the emerging authority of groundwater control districts in Texas, check out the this year’s Texas Supreme Court decision of The Edwards Aquifer Authority and the State of Texas v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 8:07 pm
In a decision last month from the Supreme Court of Canada, Dore v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:30 am
(See the IBM v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:00 am
I’ll just comment briefly on the juiciest of the three cases, Breeden v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm
See Blackwell v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 10:28 am
The Florida Bar v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:25 am
Bio-One, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:55 am
A New York-based performance artist has filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts alleging that two entertainment companies have done just that.In Maya Hayuk v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm
Article 2 of the ICESCR provides in terms that a state should take steps fully to realise the rights recognised in the Covenant “to the maximum of its available resources”. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 3:17 pm
Iowa State used a picture for an event. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 8:13 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
The Second Circuit (Newman, Cabranes and Straub) is not buying this nonsense, and it suspects the DA is changing his story because it realizes that a State Court of Appeals ruling (People v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 3:36 am
Yancy and State v. [read post]
